OctogleHire
Vetted C# engineers, AI-native

Hire senior andproven C#engineers

.NET work is mostly inherited, rarely greenfield. We match you with engineers who have carried a Framework estate onto modern .NET without a big-bang rewrite — scored, referenced and ready to start in days.

Teams shipping with Octogle Hire
Beekey
Hireflow
Corpwise
Solidus
SquareLogik
Unichats
DNO Investments
The Care App
Workchats
Beekey
Hireflow
Corpwise
Solidus
SquareLogik
Unichats
DNO Investments
The Care App
Workchats
Your shortlist, previewed

Pick the C# problem. See who we would send.

19 matching engineers · updated hourly
Aram PetrosyanSenior .NET Engineer95/ 100
Stack.NET 8, upgrade assistantOwnedFramework 4.8 to 8, 220 projectsOverlap5h with UK hours
Yerevan · UTC+4$43/h
Dorota KamińskaStaff Engineer92/ 100
StackStrangler-fig routingOwnedMigration behind a reverse proxyOverlapFull UK day
Gdańsk · UTC+2$44/h
Milica JovanovićBackend Engineer87/ 100
StackEF6 to EF CoreOwnedData layer port, zero downtimeOverlapFull UK day
Belgrade · UTC+2$34/h
The funnel

25,000 applied. 1,000 got in.

Five scored stages, all finished before a profile reaches you. Nobody skips a stage to hit a deadline.

25,000remain
Stage 01Application reviewRead by an engineer, not a keyword filter.
10,000remain
Stage 02HR + communication screenLive English fluency and product-mindset interview.
4,000remain
Stage 03AI-led C# interviewA 30–50 minute adaptive interview tuned to the CV.
1,600remain
Stage 04Tech lead interviewSystem design and production judgement, face to face.
1,000remain
Stage 05References + backgroundTwo calls with former leads, plus verification.
What it costs

From £15 an hour. That is the whole pricing page.

One hourly rate with our margin printed on every invoice, billed monthly. No placement fee and no notice period beyond two weeks.

What are you looking for?Rates shown in your currency, compared with hiring locally.
Hiring with Octogle£2,598to£5,716/ monthEquivalent to £15–£33 an hour
Save up to £68,587 a yearAll expenses included. No hidden costs.
Hiring locally in United Kingdom£8,314/ monthEquivalent to £48 an hour
45% higher annual costBased on loaded local cost, including employer on-costs.
Indicative only — your quote is confirmed on the brief call.
The role

What a C# engineer does

C# engineers build back-end services, APIs, worker processes, desktop tools, cloud functions, and internal platforms on the .NET ecosystem. In 2026, C# commonly sits behind ASP.NET Core APIs, event-driven services, SQL Server or PostgreSQL data stores, Azure or AWS infrastructure, and front ends built in React, Angular, Blazor, or mobile clients. Strong C# developers know the language and the runtime: async/await, LINQ, nullable reference types, generics, memory behavior, dependency injection, testing, observability, and secure API design. A mid-level engineer can deliver scoped features in an existing codebase. A senior C# engineer improves system shape: choosing the right abstraction, keeping EF Core queries efficient, avoiding async deadlocks and thread-pool pressure, designing clean service boundaries, reviewing code for maintainability, and guiding upgrades across .NET 8, .NET 9, and .NET 10 LTS. They also make tradeoffs clear to product, DevOps, and security stakeholders.

Typical responsibilities

  • Design, build, and maintain C# services using modern .NET, ASP.NET Core, REST, gRPC, background workers, and message-based workflows.
  • Model data access with EF Core or Dapper, write efficient queries, manage migrations, and diagnose database performance problems.
  • Implement reliable asynchronous and concurrent code using async/await, cancellation tokens, channels, hosted services, and resilient retry patterns.
  • Write maintainable tests with xUnit, NUnit, or MSTest; use integration testing, mocking where appropriate, and Testcontainers for real dependencies.
  • Improve production readiness through logging, metrics, tracing, health checks, configuration management, secure secrets handling, and OpenTelemetry.
  • Review code, mentor engineers, reduce technical debt, and help plan upgrades across supported .NET and C# versions.

Must-have skills

  • Strong C# fundamentals, including generics, delegates, records, pattern matching, LINQ, nullable reference types, and exception handling.
  • Production experience with .NET 8 or later, preferably including .NET 10 LTS upgrade awareness and modern SDK-style projects.
  • ASP.NET Core experience with controllers or minimal APIs, dependency injection, middleware, authentication, authorization, validation, and API versioning.
  • Deep async/await knowledge, including cancellation, ConfigureAwait context, thread-pool behavior, IAsyncEnumerable, and avoiding sync-over-async.
  • Practical data access skills with EF Core and/or Dapper, SQL query tuning, migrations, transactions, concurrency control, and indexing basics.
  • Testing discipline across unit, integration, contract, and end-to-end boundaries using tools such as xUnit, FluentAssertions, Moq/NSubstitute, and Testcontainers.
  • Cloud and delivery fluency: Docker, CI/CD pipelines, environment configuration, observability, and deploying .NET services to Azure, AWS, or Kubernetes.

Nice to have

  • Experience with event-driven systems using MassTransit, NServiceBus, Kafka, RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus, or AWS SQS/SNS.
  • Knowledge of performance tuning with BenchmarkDotNet, dotnet-counters, dotnet-trace, PerfView, memory dumps, and allocation analysis.
  • Familiarity with Native AOT, trimming, source generators, Roslyn analyzers, and when these features are or are not appropriate.
  • Experience modernizing legacy .NET Framework, WCF, Web Forms, or Windows services into supported .NET and cloud-ready architectures.
  • Domain experience in regulated systems, multi-tenant SaaS, financial platforms, healthcare, identity, or high-availability enterprise software.
How to interview

8 C# interview questions that reveal real depth

These are the kinds of questions our engineers use in technical interviews. Each comes with what a strong answer sounds like.

Full set: 25 C# questions by level, with red flags
  1. Q1

    How do you design an ASP.NET Core API endpoint so it stays maintainable as requirements grow?

    Strong answer: A strong candidate separates transport concerns from domain logic, validates input near the boundary, keeps handlers thin, and uses clear request and response contracts. They discuss DI, middleware, filters or endpoint filters, versioning, authorization, logging, and testability. They avoid putting EF Core queries, business rules, and mapping logic directly into controllers unless the endpoint is intentionally simple.

  2. Q2

    Tell me about a time an EF Core query caused a production or near-production performance issue. How did you diagnose and fix it?

    Strong answer: A strong answer mentions inspecting generated SQL, query plans, indexes, projection, tracking behavior, includes, split queries, pagination, and N+1 problems. They know when to use AsNoTracking, compiled queries, raw SQL, or Dapper. They also explain how they added tests, monitoring, or review practices to prevent the same class of issue from recurring.

  3. Q3

    What are the most common async/await mistakes you look for in C# code reviews?

    Strong answer: Look for sync-over-async such as .Result or .Wait, missing cancellation tokens, fire-and-forget tasks without supervision, excessive Task.Run on server code, blocking locks around async work, and swallowing exceptions. A strong candidate explains thread-pool starvation, request cancellation, IAsyncDisposable, ValueTask tradeoffs, and how to make asynchronous code observable and safe.

  4. Q4

    How would you approach upgrading a large service from an older .NET version to .NET 10 LTS?

    Strong answer: A strong candidate starts with inventory: target frameworks, NuGet packages, build agents, analyzers, nullable settings, breaking changes, and deployment constraints. They prefer small upgrade steps, automated tests, compatibility checks, and canary releases. They discuss replacing unsupported APIs, updating containers, reviewing EF Core behavior changes, and coordinating rollback plans with operations.

  5. Q5

    When would you choose EF Core, Dapper, or raw ADO.NET in a C# service?

    Strong answer: A strong answer avoids dogma. EF Core fits rich domain models, change tracking, migrations, and standard CRUD. Dapper is useful for explicit SQL, reporting, and performance-sensitive reads. Raw ADO.NET is rare but useful for low-level control. They should mention transaction boundaries, maintainability, query ownership, mapping complexity, and team familiarity.

  6. Q6

    How do you make a C# microservice observable enough to support in production?

    Strong answer: A strong candidate covers structured logs, correlation IDs, distributed tracing, metrics, health checks, and meaningful error handling. They mention OpenTelemetry, ASP.NET Core logging, dependency instrumentation, dashboards, and alertable signals. They distinguish diagnostic detail from noise and avoid logging secrets or personal data. They also include runbooks and deployment visibility.

  7. Q7

    What does good automated testing look like for a C# back-end service?

    Strong answer: A strong answer balances fast unit tests with integration tests that use real infrastructure where it matters. They mention xUnit or NUnit, FluentAssertions, test data builders, Testcontainers, WebApplicationFactory, contract tests, and database migration tests. They avoid over-mocking EF Core and explain how test design supports refactoring rather than locking in implementation details.

  8. Q8

    How do you decide where to place business logic in a .NET application?

    Strong answer: A strong candidate places core rules in domain or application services rather than controllers, EF entities, or UI layers by default. They discuss boundaries, invariants, validation types, transaction scope, and dependency direction. They can work with clean architecture, vertical slices, or modular monoliths, but they choose structure based on complexity, team size, and change rate.

Job description

Senior C# engineer job description

A ready-to-paste template. Or skip the posting entirely: send it to us as your brief and get a scored shortlist in 48 hours.

Mid and lead versions
About the role
We are hiring a Senior C# Engineer to build and improve production .NET services used by our customers and internal teams.
You will work on APIs, background workers, data access, integrations, observability, and deployment readiness.

What you'll do
Design and deliver C# services using modern .NET and ASP.NET Core.
Build reliable REST or gRPC APIs and asynchronous workflows.
Write efficient EF Core or SQL data access code.
Improve tests across unit, integration, and service boundaries.
Review code, mentor engineers, and reduce technical debt.
Support production systems with strong logging, metrics, tracing, and clear runbooks.
Help plan upgrades across supported .NET versions and related packages.

What you'll bring
Strong C# and .NET experience in production systems.
Good judgment around async code, dependency injection, data modeling, and API design.
Experience with SQL databases, CI/CD, Docker, and cloud deployments.
A practical testing mindset and comfort debugging real production issues.
Clear written communication for a remote engineering team.
Why teams choose Octogle

What you get with C#

Pre-Vetted Expertise

Every C# developer on OctogleHire passes a rigorous vetting process covering technical skills, communication, and problem-solving ability.

Start in Days, Not Months

Skip the lengthy recruitment cycle. Our C# engineers are ready to integrate with your team and start delivering within days.

Up to 60% Cost Savings

Access world-class C# talent at a fraction of the cost of local hires, without compromising on quality or experience.

Risk-Free Trial Period

Every C# engagement starts with a trial period. If you're not completely satisfied, you pay nothing.

What you get

The engagement, as a spec sheet

Shortlist3–5 scored profiles in 48 hoursEach with a technical assessment, a system-design write-up and reference checks already completed.
EngagementFull-time on one clientIn your repo, your standups and your on-call rotation. Part-time from 20 hours on request.
RateOne published hourly rateOur margin is printed on every invoice. No placement fee and no annual minimum.
Trial14-day replacement guarantee30 days on Marketplace. If the fit is wrong we re-shortlist inside 48 hours.
NoticeTwo weeksNo long-term lock-in and no cancellation fee.
ComplianceHandled in 30+ countriesContracts, IP assignment, payroll and local employment law. You receive a single invoice.
IPYours from the first commitAssigned in the master agreement, signed before repository access is granted.
SecurityISO 27001, GDPR, CCPAEU or US data residency available on request.
Compare

How OctogleHire compares

Vetting

Agency

Resume screening only

Freelance

Self-reported skills

OctogleHire

5-stage technical vetting (1 in 25 pass rate)

Time to Hire

Agency

6–12 weeks

Freelance

Weeks of filtering

OctogleHire

48 hours to first match

Cost

Agency

$20K–$40K placement fees

Freelance

Low rates, variable quality

OctogleHire

40–60% less, no placement fee

Compliance

Agency

You manage it

Freelance

You manage it

OctogleHire

Fully managed (30+ countries)

Replacement

Agency

30–90 days (if any)

Freelance

None

OctogleHire

14–30 day replacement guarantee

Support

Agency

Account rep (9-5)

Freelance

Ticket system

OctogleHire

Dedicated account manager

Daniel bell
“We in need of a handful of developers for our internal CRM build after speaking with multiple agencies and receiving some quotations we sat down with Yaseen from Octogle and we were pleasantly surprised to see what was available for us within their talent pool. we took on three developers saving upwards of circa £6000 per month and developing the software in record time exactly how we wanted it. Highly suggest anyone to use octogle hire if you’re looking for a cost-effective high-quality software development solution.”
Daniel bellCMO, TNW Energy3Senior full stack developerss hired£225,000saved per year
Questions

Questions engineering leaders ask

Yes, when the product needs a stable, high-performance back end with strong tooling and long-term maintainability. C# works well for APIs, microservices, background workers, enterprise integrations, and cloud-native systems. The .NET release cadence, ASP.NET Core, EF Core, and first-class support in Azure and strong support on AWS make it a practical choice for many modern teams.

Both ecosystems are mature. Choose C# if your stack already uses .NET, Azure, Microsoft identity, SQL Server, Blazor, Windows workloads, or existing C# services. Choose Java if your platform is already JVM-heavy. The main hiring question is not which language is better, but whether the engineer understands production service design, data access, testing, and operations.

Test more than syntax. Ask candidates to design an API, reason about async failure modes, tune an EF Core query, write tests around a dependency, and explain a production debugging process. Strong senior candidates can discuss tradeoffs, not just patterns. They should also communicate clearly about deployment, observability, security, and maintaining code across .NET versions.

It depends on the codebase size, documentation, test coverage, and domain complexity. A strong C# engineer can usually make small fixes quickly, but deeper productivity requires understanding data models, service boundaries, deployment flow, and production risks. A clear onboarding path, local setup script, architecture notes, and reviewable starter tasks help far more than language familiarity alone.

Use a freelancer for a defined migration, integration, performance fix, audit, or feature with clear boundaries. Hire full-time when the work involves ongoing ownership, product context, production support, architecture decisions, and team mentoring. C# systems often live for many years, so ownership and continuity matter when the role touches core services or data models.

Yes, if the engineering process is explicit. Remote C# teams need clear tickets, written design notes, predictable code review, CI feedback, shared debugging practices, and good documentation for local development and deployment. Senior engineers should be comfortable discussing tradeoffs in writing, pairing when needed, and leaving decisions visible in pull requests or lightweight architecture records.

Common mistakes include overvaluing framework trivia, ignoring SQL and production debugging skills, and treating all .NET experience as equal. A candidate who only maintained legacy .NET Framework apps may need support with modern ASP.NET Core, containers, OpenTelemetry, and cloud delivery. Conversely, a strong senior engineer should be able to modernize legacy code without dismissing business constraints.

Use a realistic small service instead of algorithm puzzles. Ask for an ASP.NET Core endpoint, validation, data access, tests, and a short explanation of tradeoffs. Keep the scope limited and provide clear evaluation criteria. Good signals include readable structure, safe async code, practical error handling, meaningful tests, and awareness of how the service would run in production.

You'll receive 3–5 vetted candidate profiles within 48 hours of your demo call. Most companies go from first intro to signed contract in under 5 business days — compared to 6–12 weeks with traditional agencies.

Every developer passes a 5-stage process: application screening, stack-specific technical assessment, live system design interview, soft-skills evaluation, and reference checks. From over 25,000 applicants reviewed, only 1,000 have been accepted into our network.

OctogleHire engineers start at £15/hr (about $19), with senior engineers at about £24/hr. That is roughly 50–65% less than the loaded cost of an equivalent in-house hire in the UK, US or Australia — a senior UK hire costs about £48/hr once employer costs are included. There are no upfront fees or placement commissions; you pay one published hourly rate once your engineer starts.

Every placement includes a risk-free replacement guarantee — 14 days on our On-Demand plan and 30 days on our Marketplace plan. If a developer doesn't meet your expectations, we'll find a replacement at no additional cost and manage the transition for you. Our replacement rate is under 6%.

No sales call in between

Send the brief. Meet C# engineers on Thursday.

Twenty minutes with an Octogle engineer, then three to five scored profiles inside 48 hours. Free to post, with a replacement guarantee on every placement.